A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has considering that grow to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Rene Collier and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment within the legal timeline.
On the core with the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to arranging regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple simply just wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been involved in local advocacy on scheduling and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-superior drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded by means of waistline-high drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an abnormal solution.
As the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and organizing situations. But the human component remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre in the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether or not it will eventually ultimately be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.